- Finitive Technologies OÜ licence No FVT000547, registry code 16313563
www.aquanow.io
Authorisation to operate in markets in crypto-assets
The Crypto Markets Act (hereinafter CMA) brought the activities of participants in markets in crypto-assets under the supervision of Finansinspektsioon. The Market in Crypto-Assets Act applies to persons who are engaged in the issuance, offer and admission to trading of crypto-assets on the respective platform, and who provide crypto-asset services within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council (hereinafter MiCA).
For the purposes of CMA and MiCA, crypto-assets are divided into
Asset-referenced token is a type of crypto-asset that is not an e-money token and that purports to maintain a stable value by referencing another value or right or a combination thereof, including one or more official currencies.
E-money token is a type of crypto-asset that purports to maintain a stable value by referencing the value of one official currency.
Other crypto-assets are a type of crypto-asset that is not an asset-referenced token or an e-money token and that does not reference another value or right or a combination thereof and does not maintain a stable value by referencing the value of one official currency.
Application for authorisation to operate in markets in crypto-assets
When applying for authorisation to operate, a distinction must be made between the asset-referenced token and e-money token issuance service and the provision of other crypto-asset services.
Asset-referenced token issuance service
A person may not make an offer to the public, or seek the admission to trading, of an asset-referenced token unless that person is the issuer of that asset-referenced token and is:
Upon the written consent of the issuer of an asset-referenced token, other persons may also offer to the public, or seek the admission to trading, of that asset-referenced token. Those persons must comply with Articles 27, 29, and 40 of MiCA.
A credit institution that intends to provide an asset-referenced token issuance service submits an application for authorisation to operate in markets in crypto-assets in accordance with Article 17 of MiCA and § 6(2) of the CMA. If a credit institution intends to issue, and seek the admission to trading, of e-money tokens, it must comply with the conditions laid down in Article 48 of MiCA and notify the white paper to Finantsinspektsioon.
A legal entity (hereinafter applicant) who intends to issue asset-referenced tokens must submit a written application to Finantsinspektsioon in order to apply for authorisation. The application must be submitted on the basis of the EBA’s RTS for application for authorisation. The application must be submitted in Estonian. If the applicant intends to submit documents pertaining to the application in English, it must be clearly stated in the application.
Information and documents required in Article 18(1) of MiCA must be attached to the application, the content of which is specified in the EBA’s RTS:
The details of managers must be provided to Finantsinspektsioon via the fit and proper assessment form.
In addition to the above, Finantsinspektsioon’s guidelines , which can be found on the website of Finantsinspektsioon, must be taken into account when preparing the materials required for applying for authorisation and in subsequent activities.
Finantsinspektsioon may demand additional information and documents if it is not convinced on the basis of the submitted information and documents as to whether the applicant for authorisation has adequate facilities for the provision of crypto-asset services or whether it meets the requirements of legal requirements, or if other circumstances relating to the applicant need to be verified.
Finantsinspektsioon will assess whether the application for authorisation for an asset-referenced token is complete within 25 working days from receiving the application for authorisation. Finantsinspektsioon informs the applicant whether the application is complete or incomplete. If Finantsinspektsioon has come to the conclusion that the application for authorisation is complete, Finantsinspektsioon will assess within 60 working days whether the applicant issuer meets the requirements established for the issuer of an asset-referenced token. If any additional questions arise, the time limit for the above procedure may be paused for up to 20 working days.
E-money token issuance service
A person may make an offer to the public, or seek the admission to trading, of an e-money token if that person is the issuer of such e-money token and:
Upon the written consent of the issuer, other persons may offer to the public, and seek the admission to trading, of the e-money token. Those persons must comply with Articles 50 and 53 of MiCA.
An e-money institution that intends to operate as a crypto-asset service provider must comply with the conditions for the provision of crypto-asset services as laid down in Article 60 of MiCA and in § 6(3) of CMA and must provide Finantsinspektsioon with proper and complete information.
By its decision, Finantsinspektsioon confirms the right of a credit institution and e-money institution to offer, and seek the admission to trading, of an e-money token issued by them if the credit institution or e-money institution complies with the conditions provided in Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council and has notified the white paper to Finantsinspektsioon.
Other crypto-asset services
An applicant that intends to operate as a crypto-asset service provider must comply with the conditions for the provision of crypto-asset services as laid down in Article 62 of MiCA and in § 6(1) of the CMA and must provide Finantsinspektsioon with proper and complete information.
In order to provide other crypto-asset services, the applicant submits an application for authorisation on the form of Annex VI to the ESMA’s RTS.
An application for authorisation must be accompanied by the information and documents required in Article 62(2) of MiCA, the content of which is specified in Annex V to the ESMA’s RTS:
The details of managers must be provided to Finantsinspektsioon via the fit and proper assessment form.
In addition to the above, Finantsinspektsioon’s guidelines, which can be found on the website of Finantsinspektsioon, must be taken into account when preparing the materials required for applying for authorisation and in subsequent activities.
A person offering, or seeking the admission to trading, of other crypto-assets has the right to operate as a participant in markets in crypto-assets if the conditions laid down in Articles 4(1) and 5(1) of MiCA are met.
The application must be submitted in Estonian. If the applicant intends to submit documents in English, it must be clearly stated in the application.
Finantsinspektsioon may demand additional information and documents if it is not convinced on the basis of the submitted information and documents as to whether the applicant for authorisation has adequate facilities for the provision of crypto-asset services or whether it meets the requirements of legislation, or if other circumstances relating to the applicant need to be verified.
Finantsinspektsioon will assess whether the application for authorisation for other crypto-asset services is complete within 25 working days. Finantsinspektsioon informs the applicant of whether the application is complete or incomplete. If Finantsinspektsioon has come to the conclusion that the application for authorisation is complete, Finantsinspektsioon will assess within 40 working days whether the applicant crypto-asset service provider meets the requirements of MiCA and CMA. The aforementioned time limit may be paused for up to 20 working days. The applicant will be informed about it within five working days after making the decision.
Processing fee
The processing fee payable when applying for authorisation of a crypto-asset service provider, issuer of an asset-referenced token or e-money institution is 3,000 euros.
Cross-border provision of crypto-asset services
If a crypto-asset service provider intends to provide crypto-asset services in more than one Member State, the following information to the competent authority of the home Member State must be submitted:
A crypto-asset service provider may begin to provide services in the Member States set out in the notification from the day when the competent authority of that State has received the notification of Finantsinspektsioon or at the latest after 15 calendar days have passed from the submission of the information to Finantsinspektsioon. No processing fee is to be paid upon notification of cross-border provision of services.
In 2023, the FIU received 12,500 reports. About €3.85 million worth of property was restricted by court permission for a year. Additionally, 10 injunctions were issued, transferring nearly €1.36 million to the state. By the year's end, courts had seized approximately €9.2 million, initially identified and restricted by the FIU. As of December 31, 2023, the FIU had frozen €33 million due to financial sanction. Moreover, 150 market participants either gave up or lost their licenses. In 2023, nearly 5,000 individuals benefited from various training and information events.
Setting up a company in Croatia can offer several advantages, making it an attractive location for business establishment:
Strategic Location: Croatia's geographical location provides access to both Central and Southeast Europe, serving as a bridge between Western Europe and the Balkans. This can be advantageous for companies aiming to access markets in these regions.
EU Membership: Croatia is a member of the European Union (EU) since 2013. This membership provides businesses with access to EU markets, funding, and various support programs aimed at fostering economic growth and development.
Business Incentives: The Croatian government offers various incentives to attract foreign investments, such as subsidies, grants, tax breaks, and other financial benefits to stimulate economic activities and job creation.
Skilled Workforce: Croatia has a relatively well-educated and skilled workforce, particularly in sectors such as tourism, IT, engineering, and manufacturing. The availability of skilled labor can be beneficial for companies seeking specific expertise.
Tourism Potential: Croatia's beautiful coastline, historic cities, and natural landscapes attract millions of tourists annually. For businesses in the hospitality, travel, and leisure industries, this presents opportunities for growth and expansion.
Infrastructure Development: Croatia has been investing in improving its infrastructure, including transportation networks, ports, and energy systems. This ongoing development can benefit businesses by providing better logistical support and connectivity.
Quality of Life: Croatia offers a high quality of life with a Mediterranean climate, beautiful scenery, and a relatively low cost of living compared to some other European countries. This can be appealing for expatriates and employees relocating for work.
Stable Political Environment: Croatia has a stable political environment, which is crucial for business stability and growth. Being a part of the EU further ensures adherence to EU regulations and standards, offering a predictable business environment.
Ease of Doing Business: Efforts have been made to simplify administrative procedures and improve the ease of doing business in Croatia. The government has implemented measures to streamline processes, reducing bureaucracy for entrepreneurs.
Investment Opportunities: There are various sectors with untapped potential for investment in Croatia, such as renewable energy, technology, agriculture, and infrastructure, providing opportunities for innovative businesses.
Before setting up a company in Croatia, it's essential to conduct thorough research, consider the specific industry, understand local regulations, and consult with legal and financial advisors to ensure a smooth and successful establishment of your business.
In Croatia, dividends refer to the distribution of profits that a company pays to its shareholders from its after-tax earnings. Here are some key aspects related to dividends in Croatia:
Taxation on Dividends: Dividends received by shareholders in Croatia are subject to taxation. As of my last knowledge update in January 2022, dividends were taxed at a flat rate of 12% for residents and non-residents alike. However, tax rates and regulations may have changed, so it's crucial to verify the current tax laws with a professional or relevant authorities.
Tax Treaties: Croatia has tax treaties with various countries to avoid double taxation on dividends. These treaties might reduce the tax rates on dividends for shareholders residing in countries that have such agreements with Croatia.
Withholding Tax: In Croatia, withholding tax is applied on dividends paid to non-residents. The rate is typically 12% but may be reduced according to tax treaties between Croatia and the shareholder's country of residence.
Imputation System: Croatia uses a partial imputation system for dividends. This means that the tax paid by the company on its profits is attributed as a tax credit to the shareholders receiving dividends. This credit helps offset the tax liability of the shareholder to some extent.
Legal Requirements: Companies distributing dividends must comply with legal requirements, including having sufficient distributable reserves and following the rules outlined in the Companies Act and other relevant regulations.
Tax Reporting and Compliance: Both companies paying dividends and shareholders receiving them have certain tax reporting and compliance obligations in Croatia. Companies need to declare dividends distributed, and shareholders need to report received dividends in their tax returns.
It's important to note that tax laws and regulations are subject to change, and the specifics regarding dividends can vary based on the type of company, the residency status of shareholders, and any bilateral tax agreements in place between Croatia and other countries.
For accurate and up-to-date information on dividends, taxation, and any recent changes in Croatian tax laws regarding dividends, it's advisable to consult with a tax professional, accountant, or legal advisor familiar with Croatian tax regulations.
www.aquanow.io
The new procedure helps to avoid situations in which the Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit licences a small fund manager, but the enterprise has yet to register their activity with Finantsinspektsioon. In that case, the Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit cannot be certain of the small fund manager, nor can it mitigate the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing.
According to the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act, fund managers are considered financial institutions. Therefore, the company must apply for a financial institution's activity license from the Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (MLTFPA § 70 section 1 subsection 1).
Registering a company and obtaining a cryptocurrency license in Lithuania will provide you with the opportunity to offer services for the exchange of cryptocurrencies and the storage of crypto assets in the legal field of the EU, as well as on the territory of other states without violating the law.
500+ of our clients have already successfully obtained licenses to work with crypto-assets in Lithuania with our help and are actively developing their projects in countries of the European Union.
Lithuanian crypto license will undoubtedly become an effective tool for your business, as a company operating in the field of cryptocurrencies is required to have a license.
New requirements for the VASP license application
In order to apply for the VASP license in Estonia, the applicant must:
a) have a sound internal compliance and risk management framework in place, including AML regulations, risk management policies, business continuity plan, etc.;
b) have no prior convictions regarding economic activities and have a good business reputation (be “fit and proper”), this includes both, the management of the company and the investors;
c) have a share capital of EUR 250,000 to offer virtual currency transfer service or otherwise share capital of EUR 100,000 for other VASP services. Source of funding must be thoroughly disclosed as well;
d) draw up the business plan and financial projections for at least two subsequent years;
e) depending the services to be offered, have enough capital for the “own funds” buffer, calculated either based on fixed cost or transaction volume, depending on offered services;
f) have substantial local substance – Estonian local managers, AML officer, employees, office, etc.;
g) have a sound IT system framework & a plan to provide services.
To sum up, applicants are expected to create a functioning business unit in Estonia that is also governed from Estonia. Many of the requirements above are not surprising to those, who have already worked in the financial sector as new requirements mimic the existing financial service provider’s requirements to a great extent.
New requirements for the existing VASPs
All the organisational requirements applicable for new VASP applications shall also be enforced for the existing VASPs. VASPs must review their internal setup to see if they need to improve or adjust internal controls, risk assessments, management board’s composition, etc. While there are many tiny details included in the new AML Act, we strongly advise to keep in mind at least the following:
a) Make sure that you have identified the VASP services you provide under the amended AML act. It is very important to establish how much the share capital should be increased and what the specific own funds’ requirements are. For example, the virtual currency transfer service makes it obligatory to have a share capital of EUR 250,000 and enough own funds based on the percentage of transaction volume. While it is obvious that this transfer service shall be applied to various crypto payment services, it should be noted that transfer means any kind of transfer between two wallets. Hence, if the crypto exchange offers account withdrawals off-exchange in cryptocurrencies, this transaction is also a transfer service because the movement of funds is from wallet A to wallet B.
b) Auditing is mandatory. An important caveat is that for the companies, the fiscal year of which begins earlier than 10.03.2022, the auditing obligation shall be applied from 2023 onward. If the company’s fiscal year starts after 10.03.2022, the auditing obligation is applied right away.
c) An internal auditing is mandatory. VASPs must hire/outsource an internal audit service provider. Internal auditor is someone, who regularly reviews the effectiveness of a company’s internal controls and regulations. In practice, this means that VASPs must use the “three lines of defence” internal control system, required from other financial service providers as well.
d) MLROs/AML Officers are tied to two companies. The newly amended law stipulates that MLROs/AML Officers can only serve two separate companies. The Financial Intelligence Unit (“FIU”) can allow persons to be a member of the management board for one additional company, but this is an exception that the FIU is not forced to provide. Currently, most MLROs/AML Officers serve on multiple management boards simultaneously. If the company’s MLRO/AML Officer is also serving on multiple boards, it is wise to have a discussion if the person shall remain with the current company or if a new MLRO/AML Officer must be hired.
e) Making changes is more expensive. Every change regarding the composition of the management board, shareholders, etc., shall cost EUR 4,000. Therefore, it is advisable to make the changes rarely and together in bulk, if necessary.
f) Higher F&P requirements for the management board members. All members of the management board must have at least higher education and have professional work experience for at least 2 years.
g) Transaction monitoring. Upon any exchange or transaction activity, transaction ID and information regarding both, the originator and recipient must be saved and stored. If possible, such information must be shared with the recipient service provider. This is a simplified version of the FATF (Financial Action Task Force) “Travel Rule”. If it is not possible to share information with the recipient’s service provider, the VASP must simply store transaction data and monitor all the transactions live to stop any suspicious transactions from occurring.
Most of those requirements are applicable from 15.06.2022. However, the requirement regarding transaction monitoring shall be applicable from 15.03.2022. Therefore, it is important that existing VASPs start working on upgrading the level of compliance as soon as possible. Before 15.06.2022, VASPs must provide the FIU proof that new measures have been implemented and VASPs are compliant with the new requirements..
The financial and criminal dynamics across the world are also changing. Financial crime is becoming more sophisticated and hard to detect. In the wake of the increasing cases of laundering and scams; businesses and financial institutions are adopting a risk-based approach to avoid losses from fraud and penalties. Organisations are using KYC and AML compliance to check financial crimes before they happen. Firms are also scrutinising risk exposure to PEPs and sanctioned governments. The fear of being penalised is a strong motivating factor to maintain ongoing, robust compliance systems.
The FATF Travel Rule is an update to the existing FATF Recommendation 16, which concerns cross-border and domestic wire transfers. The update is intended to address the AML/CFT challenges associated with the increasing global use of cryptocurrency and to help law enforcement agencies better track criminals who use cryptocurrency to launder money. The Travel Rule’s regulatory focus means that it will have specific implications for virtual asset service providers (VASPs), such as cryptocurrency exchanges and cryptocurrency wallet providers.
Officially adopted by the FATF on June 21, 2019, the progress that member-states have made in implementing the Travel Rule will be reviewed during the FATF plenary session in June 2020 as well as whether the guidance has remained fit for purpose given the speed with which the technology is moving. Given its far-reaching regulatory scope, all VASPs and other obligated entities should be familiar with the Travel Rule and the AML/CFT compliance obligations that it entails.
Under Recommendation 16’s Travel Rule, the originators and beneficiaries of all transfers of digital funds must exchange identifying information. The rule will apply to all VASPs, financial institutions and obliged entities. Additionally, the originators and beneficiaries involved in a transfer must be able to guarantee the accuracy of the information they send to the other.
Prior to the introduction of the Travel Rule, companies that conducted wire transfers of conventional funds already had to issue a range of reciprocal information. The new rule essentially extends that obligation to cryptocurrency transfers. In principle, the Travel Rule is similar to a number of existing global audit regulations: the United States’ Bank Secrecy Act, for example, requires an exchange of information for funds of a value equal or greater than $3,000.
As part of FATF Recommendation 16, originators of virtual asset transfers must submit the following information to beneficiaries:
Beneficiaries must submit the following information to originators:
The rapid growth of cryptocurrency usage has led to regulatory inconsistency in jurisdictions across the world and has created opportunities for money launderers and terrorists to commit financial crimes using virtual assets. The anonymity of blockchain technology is particularly useful for money launderers: while the originator of cryptocurrency transfers provides verified information (name, address, etc.), the beneficiary is able to remain anonymous.
The Travel Rule will help AML/CFT efforts by enhancing the audit trail when virtual assets are transferred between entities such as exchanges and wallets. The new information collection rules will mean that financial authorities are better able to detect and prevent money laundering activities involving cryptocurrency and will also help deter criminals by reducing the number of VASPs through which they can move funds.
Information sharing is at the heart of the Travel Rule, but given the relative lack of regulation in the cryptocurrency industry, it represents a significant compliance obligation for many VASPs.
The lack of identifying ownership information necessary to facilitate cryptocurrency transfers means that VASPs and financial institutions must develop AML solutions that allow them to share the necessary data and that comply with existing privacy laws, such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation and California’s Consumer Privacy Act.
In addition to fulfilling those regulatory obligations, VASPs must consider the costs and administrative effort that their Travel Rule solutions will involve and find a way to keep cryptocurrency transactions efficient and cost-effective for customers.
An ideal Travel Rule solution should satisfy regulatory obligations without disrupting customer service needs. Accordingly, the FATF has suggested a range of characteristics that a Travel Rule solution should feature to meet the objectives of Recommendation 16:
While the FATF is technologically neutral, it suggests a number of approaches that may help VASPs implement a Travel Rule solution by leveraging existing technology and infrastructure. These include:
FATF organizations and authorities in FATF member states are considering implementation approaches to Recommendation 16, including establishing a centralized, global database that would collect information on every VASP worldwide and their customers.
Under this proposal, VASPs would register in their home countries to receive a unique identification code (similar to a bank SWIFT code). The unique code attached to each VASP would then be uploaded to the global database that would connect all VASPs operating under the Recommendation 16 Travel Rule. Accordingly, during subsequent digital asset transfers, VASPs would use their respective identifier codes to verify the information they are exchanging in compliance with the Travel Rule.
On July 5, 2021, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) completed its second 12-month review of the implementation of its revised Standards on virtual assets and virtual asset service providers. This review looks at how jurisdictions and the private sector have implemented the revised Standards since the FATF’s first 12-month review.
The FATF’s first 12-month review report found that, overall, both the public and private sectors had made progress in implementing the revised FATF Standards, however, substantial work remained for the revised FATF Standards to be effectively implemented globally. As such, this second 12-month review focuses on the continued implementation of the FATF Standards.
While the second 12-month review reveals progress has been made in the implementation of the Revised FATF Standards, after two years many jurisdictions still do not have the basic regulatory framework for VASPs. The FATF covers more than 200 countries and jurisdictions, however, less than half (45%) of the 128 reporting jurisdictions reported that they have passed the necessary laws/regulations to permit or prohibit VASPs.
The number of jurisdictions whose AML/CFT regime for VASPs is actually operational is even lower. Most jurisdictions and most VASPs are not complying with the travel rule with only 10 jurisdictions reporting that they have implemented and are enforcing Travel Rule requirements for VASPs.
It is assumed that the majority of jurisdictions that did not provide a response to the FATF in this report have made even less progress in the implementation of the Revised FATF Standards.
The Travel Rule is the most focused on issue in terms of VASPs’ compliance with the revised FATF Standards. Yet only 10 jurisdictions reported that they are actively enforcing Travel Rule requirements for VASPs. An additional 14 jurisdictions reported that they have introduced Travel Rule regulations but were not yet enforced the requirements. No jurisdictions reported being aware of any VASP that fully complied with all elements of the Travel Rule.
There are various technologies and tools available that enable VASPs to comply with the Travel Rule, yet compliance with the Travel Rule continues to be reported as challenging due to “the lack of one unified technology to support it,” according to the FATF report.
Since FATF’s first 12-Month Review, there has been significant progress in Travel Rule technology development. Several standards and protocols—such as the Travel Rule Information Sharing Architecture (TRISA)—can now help enable interoperability between solutions and, when enhanced by blockchain analysis tools such as in CipherTrace Traveler, can also safely identify VASPs to exchange Travel Rule data.
The lack of Travel Rule implementation globally is a major obstacle to effective global AML/CFT mitigation and undermines the effectiveness and impact of the revised FATF Standards. For this, the FATF has indicated that one of its major next steps will be to accelerate the implementation of the Travel Rule globally.
The report finds that many jurisdictions have continued to make progress in implementing the revised FATF Standards. Out of the 128 reporting jurisdictions that responded to the FATF’s questionnaire—triple the number that responded to the first 12-month review—52 jurisdictions claimed to now regulate VASPs, 6 jurisdictions prohibit the operation of VASPs, and the other 70 jurisdictions have not yet implemented the revised Standards in their national law. These gaps in implementation mean that there is not yet a global regime to prevent the misuse of virtual assets and VASPs for money laundering or terrorist financing.
For context, in the last 12-month review, 32 jurisdictions reported having existing regulations for Virtual Asset Service Providers, 13 jurisdictions reported having regulations in development, and 5 jurisdictions indicated the prohibition or potential near future prohibition of VASPs. The increase in jurisdictions that now regulate VASPs suggests that significant progress has been made, however global implementation still has very large gaps that need to be addressed.
Only 35 of the 58 jurisdictions that claimed to now regulate or prohibit VASPs reported that their regime was currently operational.
For jurisdictions that have yet to prohibit or regulate VASPs, 26 jurisdictions reported that they were in the process of passing the necessary legislation in order to regulate or prohibit VASPs;
12 jurisdictions reported that they had already decided which approach they intended to take on VASPs but had not yet commenced the necessary legislative/regulatory process; and 32 jurisdictions reported that they had not yet decided what approach to take for VASPs.
Of the 52 jurisdictions that reported that they have established regulatory regimes permitting VASPs, only 36 of these jurisdictions advised that they have commenced licensing and registering of VASPs. Only 32 reported jurisdictions have extended their regime to included VASPs incorporated overseas but which offer products/services to customers in their jurisdiction. In total, these jurisdictions have reported that they have so far licensed or registered 2,374 VASPs—more than double the reported number of registered/licensed VASPs recorded in the first 12-month review.
The FATF calculates implementation of FATF Standards through a self-assessment by participating jurisdictions and is not an official assessment of the level of actual compliance with the FATF Standards. By assessing jurisdictions through the Mutual Evaluation and Follow-Up Report (MER/FUR) process, the FATF found that no jurisdictions with published reports have received a compliant (C) rating. Most jurisdictions have received a partially compliant (PC) rating or above. Two jurisdictions have been assessed as having a non-compliant (NC) rating.
According to the FATF, the main barrier to compliance appears to be a lack of action by jurisdictions. A third of jurisdictions with FURs/MERs assessing Recommendation 15 have taken no or minimal action to implement the requirements. The other two thirds of jurisdictions have taken action, but have not implemented the requirements fully—such as omitting Travel Rule regulations.
In the FATF Report, 36 jurisdictions provided Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) data from VASPs. According to these 36 jurisdictions, VASPs had filed 146,704 STRs between 2019 and 2020. Some jurisdictions noted that they had noted an increasing number of STRs in 2020 as more VASPs entered the market, knowledge of AML/CFT grew in the sector, and VASPs developed their reporting systems. Of the 146,704 STRs reported, 55,118 were from 2019 and 91,586 were from 2020.
Data collected by the FATF from several blockchain analysis companies, including CipherTrace, indicates the share of illicit transactions appears higher for peer-to-peer transactions than in transactions with VASPs. There were substantial differences in the data provided by the different blockchain analytic companies resulting in the FATF being unable to assess with certainty the size of the peer-to-peer sector and its associated ML/TF risk. The report therefore does not find clear evidence of a shift towards peer-to-peer transactions.
The inconsistency of results from blockchain analytics companies is indicative of inconsistent definitions, double counting and data quality issues.
All jurisdictions need to implement the revised FATF Standards, including Travel Rule requirements, as quickly as possible. The FATF will undertake the following actions focused on virtual assets and VASPs. According to the Second 12-Month Review, the FATF’s next steps will be to:
FATF’s full report can be accessed here: http://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/fatfrecommendations/documents/second-12-month-review-virtual-assets-vasps.html
With the new crypto regulations, the biggest challenge for most of the companies is setting up the local management. It’s not easy to find someone you can trust, and someone who can do the necessary work, and someone who is willing to become a member of the management board.
Some businesses just want to fulfill regulatory requirements. Meaning, they don’t expect the board member to do any business development work, and ideally, have the AML officer and the board member two in one.
It’s understandable, as the goal is to reduce the costs. However, there are some Estonian service providers advertising board member and AML officer solutions which aren’t going to be sufficient nor sustainable. For example, one service provider had installed one AML officer to 28 companies under the old regulations.
By any objective evaluation, the AML officer can’t do the work that he or she has to do for so many companies.
With the new regulations the FIU has a lot more playing ground on deciding whether the personnel of the applicant is sufficient. Hence, if there’s a solution advertised where one board member sits on 20 different companies, then this simply won’t be accepted anymore.
As an example, one service provider advertised a full solution – office, AML officer, and the board member for 990€ per month.
As the Estonian salary taxes make up almost 50% of the salary, then this calculation simply won’t add up. No eligible person is willing to receive a few hundred euros compensation per month for the scrutiny by the FIU and the liability of being a board member of any company. It’s likely that this person is going to sit on the board of many companies.
Imagine if you submit your application and the FIU finds the name of the same person who is already included in 20 other applications. Your whole application loses legitimacy, instantly.
Even if you manage to get a license (let’s say the board member you have will be added to 20 different companies later), it’s guaranteed to have a lot more scrutiny by the authorities going forward.
Even if you manage to get a license (let’s say the board member you have will be added to 20 different companies later), it’s guaranteed to have a lot more scrutiny by the authorities going forward.
The new crypto regulations were enforced for a reason. The authorities want to be able to supervise the companies operating under the Estonian crypto license. If your only goal is to optimize the expenses and to avoid having a proper set-up, it’s going to be difficult to operate this business without running into trouble with the FIU. Everything is possible, but it might make sense to avoid it.
We recommend and help our clients to recruit and build a real operational office. This means that you may have to pay more for the people you’re going to hire, but these people are actually going to work for you.
Whatever you’re going to do, it’s worth thinking about. Any regulated activity requires a good relationship with the authorities, and building a proper substance is the foundation for this relationship.
If you’re looking to apply for virtual currency service provider authorization in Estonia, you can write to us at [email protected]
-
its
geographical position at the crossroads between Europe and Russia;
-
foreign companies are not subject to
any tax on reinvested profits;
-
a skilled and well-educated workforce;
-
setting up a company in Estonia takes about 15 minutes through the online application platform;
-
the Estonian Banking system allows
for almost all operations to be conducted online;
-
Estonia is a member of the World Trade
Organization, of the European Union, of the Organization for Economic
Co-Operation and Development (OECD) and NATO.